Rankings and ratings have meaning only insofar as your tastes match the tastes of others. You could get a "proper" rating for a game only if you forced everyone in the world to play it and rate it - and coerced ratings probably aren't a reliable measure either, so let's not go there. Afterwards I thought I understood the gameplay. I recently got my hands on a copy and went through the rules myself. I don't fall into that bucket, so I'm unlikely to ever play the game, which means I'll never add my (likely low) rating to the game page. The object is to build mines, cotton factories, ports, canals and rail links, and establish trade routes, all of which will be used to score points. Brass Birmingham is a tactical game for more seasoned players. About 100 people sheltered with ponchos and umbrellas at Leamington Pump Room gardens until the rain eased in the afternoon. Gloomhaven, for example, isn't a game that casual game players will pick up on a whim, but rather an experience that calls out to those who might be interested in what it specifically offers. Rugbys Ukrainian community marked the Coronation. The rankings don't indicate absolute greatness, but rather greatness for a good number of people who are fans of that particular game or game genre. Congratulations to Gavan Brown, Matt Tolman, Martin Wallace, and Roxley for Brass: Birmingham rising to the level of 1 ranked game in the BoardGameGeek database That said, I'll note that games tend to flip-flop in positions on the BGG rankings when the difference in the Geek Rating is less than a hundredth of a point, so Gloomhaven and Brass. It's not like any of these rankings are fixed in time or that a game lands in its "proper" spot and never moves again.
0 kommentar(er)
